In this case, the Supreme Court said that Grokster, a peer-to-peer service was liable for copyright violation. It also seems like if someone else made the copy for you, they wouldn’t be in violation of copyright either. Going off the 1984 case alone, it seems like making a R copy of game you owned would not violate copyright. The deciding factor was that a majority of these consumers were making copies for their own "personal use", rather than to sell them. In the 1984 case, the court ruled that VCR manufacturers couldn't be found liable for copyright violations just because consumers used their products to make copies of videos they owned. There are, however, two Supreme Court cases that are relevant here in the United States, where I live. I read all nintendo's statements about how they don't like R's and they are "not allowed" but nintendo does not quote any laws or supreme court cases, nor do they specify which countries their usupported claims apply to. More of a discussion could be made about the R's than the E's how ever. Secondly, we can discuss the legality of E's and R's if you want. So, first of all, I own FFX on ps2 and ps3 and do not play them illegaly or "free". One is my personal use and two is the law. Second of all, there's 2 points I want to make in regards to E. That was all I was trying to get at with this thread.
Ffxiv nude mod loverslab mods#
Firstly, thank you Plex for explaining to me that it's very hard to mod a game like FFX and that I should probably give up on getting any good mods for the game.